<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MotorMouths.com Blog &#187; Nissan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.motormouths.com/tag/nissan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.motormouths.com</link>
	<description>When it comes to new cars, we know the score.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 19:32:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Winners and Losers of the 2000&#8242;s</title>
		<link>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/09/01/winners-and-losers-of-the-2000s/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/09/01/winners-and-losers-of-the-2000s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Normal Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cadillac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chevrolet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jaguar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mercedes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nissan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pontiac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toyota]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.motormouths.com/?p=2734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Depending on what you drove in the past 10 years, Cars.com&#8217;s list of the worst cars sold during the decade (from &#8220;the Caddy that Zigs&#8221; to Daewoo&#8217;s entire lineup) may bring back some laughs, or just painful memories. On the other hand, it&#8217;s list of most improved cars may give the car industry hope that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/09/01/winners-and-losers-of-the-2000s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best Driver&#8217;s Car: an Automatic?</title>
		<link>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/08/20/best-drivers-car-is-automatic/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/08/20/best-drivers-car-is-automatic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 20:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Normal Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cadillac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chevrolet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jaguar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mazda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nissan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Porsche]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.motormouths.com/?p=2655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Motor Trend has put a wide range of cars through a wider range of tests at Laguna Seca Raceway to determine the &#8220;Best Driver&#8217;s Car&#8221; for 2009. The competition pitted sedans versus convertibles, american muscle against european exotica. Could the 167 HP Mazda Miata outduel the 638 HP Corvette ZR1? Yes.  Could the $31K Camaro [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/08/20/best-drivers-car-is-automatic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Look! A Nissan GT-R on Steroids</title>
		<link>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/03/30/look-a-nissan-gt-r-on-steroids/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/03/30/look-a-nissan-gt-r-on-steroids/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Image Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nissan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.motormouths.com/?p=1486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A $170K Nissan? Road &#038; Track thinks the GT-R Spec V might just be worth it.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/03/30/look-a-nissan-gt-r-on-steroids/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rio Wins Battle of the EconoBoxes</title>
		<link>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/03/24/rio-wins-battle-of-the-econoboxes/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/03/24/rio-wins-battle-of-the-econoboxes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Normal Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nissan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toyota]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.motormouths.com/?p=1434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[USA Today&#8217;s resident critic has been tapping the economic zeitgeist of late, rolling out reviews of one budget-priced ride after another. Who wins that race? By his reckoning, it&#8217;s the Kia Rio over the Toyota Yaris and Nissan Versa. Which is a tad more definitive than these cars&#8217; overall scores on MotorMouths would indicate: the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/03/24/rio-wins-battle-of-the-econoboxes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s In Your Driveway?</title>
		<link>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/03/03/whats-in-your-driveway-9/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/03/03/whats-in-your-driveway-9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 21:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Image Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Normal Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Driveway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nissan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.motormouths.com/?p=1038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2008 Nissan Altima, Cleveland, Ohio, 11:38 a.m. [Via.]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/03/03/whats-in-your-driveway-9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Best Cheap Sedan in America?</title>
		<link>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/03/03/the-best-cheap-sedan-in-america/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/03/03/the-best-cheap-sedan-in-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 21:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Normal Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyundai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mazda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mercury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nissan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pontiac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toyota]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.motormouths.com/?p=1021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This&#8217;ll be fun. Edmunds.com just published its list of the &#8220;10 least expensive 2009 midsize sedans on the market.&#8221; It&#8217;s a handy list. Ah, but what scores do these econo-sedans get from published critics? Glad you asked: 2009 Kia Optima, $17,495. Score on MotorMouths: 77 2009 Mazda Mazda6, $18,550. Score on MotorMouths: 82 2009 Hyundai [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/03/03/the-best-cheap-sedan-in-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

