<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MotorMouths.com Blog &#187; Mitsubishi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.motormouths.com/tag/mitsubishi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.motormouths.com</link>
	<description>When it comes to new cars, we know the score.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 19:32:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rant: 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander</title>
		<link>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/03/10/rant-2009-mitsubishi-outlander/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/03/10/rant-2009-mitsubishi-outlander/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Normal Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitsubishi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.motormouths.com/?p=1148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kelsey Mays, curmudgeonly critic of Cars.com, roundhouses Mitsubishi&#8217;s Outlander. Halfway through this review, I realized I was convincing myself — one paragraph at a time — that I actually don&#8217;t like the Mitsubishi Outlander, so I had to reverse course. Luckily for Mitsubishi, May&#8217;s score of 70 for the little SUV is about 10 points [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/03/10/rant-2009-mitsubishi-outlander/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

