<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MotorMouths.com Blog &#187; Jaguar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.motormouths.com/tag/jaguar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.motormouths.com</link>
	<description>When it comes to new cars, we know the score.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 19:32:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Winners and Losers of the 2000&#8242;s</title>
		<link>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/09/01/winners-and-losers-of-the-2000s/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/09/01/winners-and-losers-of-the-2000s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Normal Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cadillac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chevrolet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jaguar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mercedes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nissan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pontiac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toyota]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.motormouths.com/?p=2734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Depending on what you drove in the past 10 years, Cars.com&#8217;s list of the worst cars sold during the decade (from &#8220;the Caddy that Zigs&#8221; to Daewoo&#8217;s entire lineup) may bring back some laughs, or just painful memories. On the other hand, it&#8217;s list of most improved cars may give the car industry hope that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/09/01/winners-and-losers-of-the-2000s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best Driver&#8217;s Car: an Automatic?</title>
		<link>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/08/20/best-drivers-car-is-automatic/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/08/20/best-drivers-car-is-automatic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 20:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Normal Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cadillac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chevrolet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jaguar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mazda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nissan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Porsche]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.motormouths.com/?p=2655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Motor Trend has put a wide range of cars through a wider range of tests at Laguna Seca Raceway to determine the &#8220;Best Driver&#8217;s Car&#8221; for 2009. The competition pitted sedans versus convertibles, american muscle against european exotica. Could the 167 HP Mazda Miata outduel the 638 HP Corvette ZR1? Yes.  Could the $31K Camaro [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/08/20/best-drivers-car-is-automatic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dependability: Age Old Question</title>
		<link>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/03/19/dependability-age-old-question/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/03/19/dependability-age-old-question/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Normal Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jaguar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.motormouths.com/?p=1370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmmm. Seems Lexus just lost its spot atop J.D. Power&#8217;s annual Vehicle Dependability Ratings. Who upset the long-time champ? Two usurpers: Jaguar, up from 10th place, and Buick, which rose from 6th. (Suzuki and Volkswagen tied for last place.) Given the good reviews that Buick&#8217;s Enclave and Jaguar&#8217;s XF are garnering, this isn&#8217;t that surprising. But [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/03/19/dependability-age-old-question/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

