<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MotorMouths.com Blog &#187; GM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.motormouths.com/tag/gm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.motormouths.com</link>
	<description>When it comes to new cars, we know the score.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 19:32:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Chevy Volt (Prototype) scores 82</title>
		<link>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/12/02/chevy-volt-prototype-scores-82/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/12/02/chevy-volt-prototype-scores-82/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 23:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Image Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chevrolet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.motormouths.com/?p=2946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A prototype Chevy Volt is winning guarded praise from critics during brief tests in L.A.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/12/02/chevy-volt-prototype-scores-82/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Porsche for Car of the Year?</title>
		<link>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/10/08/a-porsche-for-car-of-the-year/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/10/08/a-porsche-for-car-of-the-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 21:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Normal Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acura]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cadillac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chevrolet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyundai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Land Rover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mazda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mercedes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Porsche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subaru]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suzuki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volvo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VW]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.motormouths.com/?p=2843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The finalists for the 2010 North American Car and Truck of the Year Award are out and we couldn&#8217;t help doing a little prognostication as to who might follow the 2009&#8242;s winner, the Hyundai Genesis (above). By Motormouths scores alone the Porsche Panamera should be a lock for the Car award with a 90 score  [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/10/08/a-porsche-for-car-of-the-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Winners and Losers of the 2000&#8242;s</title>
		<link>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/09/01/winners-and-losers-of-the-2000s/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/09/01/winners-and-losers-of-the-2000s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Normal Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cadillac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chevrolet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jaguar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mercedes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nissan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pontiac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toyota]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.motormouths.com/?p=2734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Depending on what you drove in the past 10 years, Cars.com&#8217;s list of the worst cars sold during the decade (from &#8220;the Caddy that Zigs&#8221; to Daewoo&#8217;s entire lineup) may bring back some laughs, or just painful memories. On the other hand, it&#8217;s list of most improved cars may give the car industry hope that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/09/01/winners-and-losers-of-the-2000s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Cool Cadillac&#8230;.Station Wagon?</title>
		<link>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/08/17/a-cool-cadillac-station-wagon/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/08/17/a-cool-cadillac-station-wagon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 19:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Normal Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cadillac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.motormouths.com/?p=2617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 2010 Cadillac CTS Sport Wagon (yes &#8220;Wagon&#8221; they arent coyly calling it a crossover) is getting enthusiastic thumbs up from Automobile, Motor Trend, and Jalopnik whose Ben Wojdyla raves&#8230; Conventional wisdom is Americans don&#8217;t like wagons, imagining them as transportation for unwashed masses of rugrats driven by people who&#8217;ve given up being cool. The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/08/17/a-cool-cadillac-station-wagon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2010 LaCrosse Getting Some Love</title>
		<link>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/07/24/2010-lacrosse-getting-some-love/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/07/24/2010-lacrosse-getting-some-love/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 22:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Image Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.motormouths.com/?p=2484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s early, but Buick&#8217;s latest is averaging a nifty 83 among critics. (Typical tout above.)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/07/24/2010-lacrosse-getting-some-love/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>They&#8217;re Broke. You&#8217;re Still Covered.</title>
		<link>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/02/24/yes-theyre-broke-and-youre-covered/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/02/24/yes-theyre-broke-and-youre-covered/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Normal Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.motormouths.com/?p=842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Saab preparing for its dirt nap, and Chrysler and GM whistling past the graveyard, The New York Times offers a helpful guide explaining what happens to your new car warranty if your car&#8217;s maker goes bankrupt. Here&#8217;s the short version: &#8220;There are no guarantees, but it is likely — if the automaker desires — [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/02/24/yes-theyre-broke-and-youre-covered/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
