<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MotorMouths.com Blog &#187; Chrysler</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.motormouths.com/tag/chrysler/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.motormouths.com</link>
	<description>When it comes to new cars, we know the score.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 19:32:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Winners and Losers of the 2000&#8242;s</title>
		<link>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/09/01/winners-and-losers-of-the-2000s/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/09/01/winners-and-losers-of-the-2000s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Normal Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cadillac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chevrolet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jaguar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mercedes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nissan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pontiac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toyota]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.motormouths.com/?p=2734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Depending on what you drove in the past 10 years, Cars.com&#8217;s list of the worst cars sold during the decade (from &#8220;the Caddy that Zigs&#8221; to Daewoo&#8217;s entire lineup) may bring back some laughs, or just painful memories. On the other hand, it&#8217;s list of most improved cars may give the car industry hope that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/09/01/winners-and-losers-of-the-2000s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exclusive: Chrysler Builds a Car</title>
		<link>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/05/29/exclusive-chrysler-builds-a-car/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/05/29/exclusive-chrysler-builds-a-car/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 21:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Image Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.motormouths.com/?p=2166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now, this is how to make a car. (1939 World&#8217;s Fair edition.) Ah, Chrysler, what happened?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/05/29/exclusive-chrysler-builds-a-car/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Car That Can Save Chrysler</title>
		<link>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/03/31/the-car-that-can-save-chrysler/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/03/31/the-car-that-can-save-chrysler/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Normal Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meta]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.motormouths.com/?p=1503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since one condition of the government&#8217;s proposed save of Chrysler is a shotgun wedding to Fiat, it seemed a good moment to take a look at Fiat&#8217;s most popular car (and the one most easily brought stateside). The Fiat 500 is a teeny, impossibly cute econocar; a sexy competitor to the MINI Cooper and Toyota [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/03/31/the-car-that-can-save-chrysler/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hi/Lo: Chrysler Sebring Convertible</title>
		<link>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/03/12/hilo-chrysler-sebring-convertible/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/03/12/hilo-chrysler-sebring-convertible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Normal Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meta]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.motormouths.com/?p=1213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Chrysler Sebring convertible isn&#8217;t beloved by critics. In fact, it&#8217;s one of the worst-reviewed cars in America. But it can claim a couple of honors here on MotorMouths. Out of some ten thousand reviews, it earned the single-lowest score awarded by a critic. And it shows the largest spread &#8212; 34 points! &#8212; between [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/03/12/hilo-chrysler-sebring-convertible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Best Bargain Mid-Size?</title>
		<link>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/03/10/the-best-bargain-mid-size/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/03/10/the-best-bargain-mid-size/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Normal Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chevrolet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.motormouths.com/?p=1064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TheTruthAboutCars.com just did a survey of three bargain-priced mid-sized American sedans, which, given the economy, has some timely import to it. Their verdict is not so pretty for Ford and Chrysler. The 2009 Ford Fusion? Hated it. Chrysler Sebring? Ditto. In fact, TTAC went thumbs-down on everything except the Chevy Malibu LS. Juicy quote after [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/03/10/the-best-bargain-mid-size/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>They&#8217;re Broke. You&#8217;re Still Covered.</title>
		<link>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/02/24/yes-theyre-broke-and-youre-covered/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/02/24/yes-theyre-broke-and-youre-covered/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Normal Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.motormouths.com/?p=842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Saab preparing for its dirt nap, and Chrysler and GM whistling past the graveyard, The New York Times offers a helpful guide explaining what happens to your new car warranty if your car&#8217;s maker goes bankrupt. Here&#8217;s the short version: &#8220;There are no guarantees, but it is likely — if the automaker desires — [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.motormouths.com/2009/02/24/yes-theyre-broke-and-youre-covered/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
